fbpx

Philips A7607 Vs. Shokz OpenRun: When Similarities Diverge

Bone conduction headphones continue to redefine the standards in earpieces for athletes. Shokz‘s expertise in bone conduction headphone technology is well-established, making its products a benchmark in the industry. Philips, a renowned name in audio technology, steps up to this challenge with its A7607, presenting a formidable competitor to Shokz’s OpenRun. But which one stands out as the superior choice?

Shokz’s OpenRun is acclaimed for its sound quality and wearing comfort. Philips has equipped the A7607 with enhanced features like an AI mic for superior call clarity, pushing the boundaries of what users can expect from bone conduction headphones. The A7607 not only matches the OpenRun in critical areas but also introduces distinctive improvements.

In this comparison, we inspect into various aspects and specifications of both models. Your personal preference will play a significant role in the final verdict. Let’s begin our side-by-side comparison.

Philips A7607 and Shokz OpenRun bone conduction headphones side by side

Philips A7607 Vs. Shokz OpenRun: The Technology

Shokz’s OpenRun headphones have long been the gold standard in high-end bone conduction technology, setting a high benchmark for competitors. Their dedication to perfecting bone conduction sound quality is evident in the OpenRun, a culmination of years of innovation and expertise.

Philips, entering this specialized market, made a significant impact with the A6606, signaling a new direction for a company renowned for its audio technology. The A6606 introduced Philips’ interpretation of bone conduction technology, aligning closely with the foundational elements seen in the OpenRun. While most users might not have noticed substantial differences between the A6606 and the OpenRun at first glance, it represented Philips’ commitment to exploring this technology.

With the introduction of the A7607, Philips takes the lessons learned from the A6606. The A7607 is building on the A6606’s foundation and pushing beyond. The A7607 seeks to address some of the OpenRun’s limitations, indicating that Philips is not content with just competing; they aim to innovate and excel. This progression from the A6606 to the A7607 highlights Philips’ journey and ambition in the bone conduction headphone market. As we explore this comparison further, the nuanced advancements of the A7607 over both the A6606 and the OpenRun become increasingly apparent.

Differences in Sound Quality

The Shokz OpenRun is known for its robust sound quality within the bone conduction headphone category. It represents a significant improvement over older models, offering a better audio experience.

However, bone conduction headphones inherently don’t match the sound quality of traditional headphones. Their open-ear design and the physical limitations of bone conduction mean a compromise in audio fidelity. The OpenRun is excellent for listening to music or podcasts while active, but not for audiophile-level sound.

The Philips A7607 also encounters these sound quality limitations. But, it introduces a unique feature: the ability to switch between Music and Voice modes. This allows for tailored audio settings – Voice mode enhances clarity for calls and podcasts, while Music mode boosts bass and treble for a richer musical experience.

While the A7607 doesn’t achieve impressive sound quality, it provides a more versatile listening experience compared to the OpenRun.

Volume control is a common challenge in bone conduction headphones due to their open-ear design. It can be hard to judge the volume level, leading users to turn it up excessively in noisy environments. This issue is present in both the OpenRun and the A7607, where careful volume management is necessary to avoid discomfort.

Microphone and Call Quality

The Shokz OpenRun provides adequate microphone quality for everyday use, but struggles with background noise.

Philips A7607 advances this with an AI-enhanced microphone for better noise reduction and a bone-conducting mic that minimizes wind interference, offering clearer call quality in various environments.

Water And Dust Resistance

The Shokz OpenRun features an IP67 rating, fully dustproof and capable of withstanding water immersion up to 1 meter for 30 minutes. This makes it ideal for outdoor and high-intensity activities.

In contrast, the Philips A7607 comes with an IP66 rating, offering complete dust protection and resistance against high-pressure water jets, but not designed for water immersion.

Both models provide robust protection for most outdoor and exercise scenarios, with the OpenRun having a slight advantage in water immersion resistance.

Battery Life And Charging

The Shokz OpenRun stands out for its quick charging capability. It offers up to 8 hours of battery life, which is standard for bone conduction headphones. However, its quick-charge feature is particularly noteworthy – a 10-minute charge delivers an impressive 1.5 hours of listening time. This makes the OpenRun exceptionally convenient for users needing a rapid boost in battery life.

In contrast, the Philips A7607 provides up to 9 hours of playtime on a single charge, slightly more than the OpenRun. It also includes a quick charging feature, but with a different performance: a 15-minute charge yields an hour of playtime. While this is beneficial for extended use, it doesn’t match the quick-charge efficiency of the OpenRun.

Bluetooth Connectivity

Both the Philips A7607 and Shokz OpenRun feature Bluetooth Multipoint technology, allowing them to connect to multiple devices simultaneously. This is a significant advantage for users who frequently switch between different audio sources, such as a phone and a computer.

Comfort And Use

Shokz OpenRun headphones are renowned for their comfort, featuring a skin-friendly silicone coating over the ear hooks and neckband. This soft and light design contributes to their overall comfort.

Like most bone conduction headphones, the OpenRun applies gentle pressure to the cheekbones and causes light vibrations against the skin. Some users might initially find this sensation irritating, but it often becomes more comfortable with time.

The Philips A7607 shares a similar design and coating to the A6606, offering a comparable level of comfort. The A7607’s vibrations against the skin are slightly less pronounced, though still noticeable.

A unique feature of the A7607 is its built-in LED lights, which are particularly useful for runners at night, enhancing both visibility and safety.

There’s a noticeable difference in weight between the two models: the OpenRun is lighter at approximately 26 grams, while the A7607 is a bit heavier at 35 grams. This difference, though small, is perceptible in terms of how they feel when worn.

Overall, while the Shokz OpenRun’s slimmer and lighter design might offer a bit more comfort, the Philips A7607’s slightly heavier build does not significantly detract from its comfort, especially considering its added safety features.

Conclusion

The Shokz OpenRun excels in comfort and lightweight design, backed by Shokz’s expertise in bone conduction technology for quality. The Philips A7607, comparable in price, offers distinctive features like enhanced noise reduction for calls and diverse audio modes, along with a longer battery life. Both headphones are closely matched, making the choice largely dependent on specific preferences like call quality and feature sets.

Related Articles: